Arterial-Washout Temporal Profiling in CEUS LI-RADS: A Diagnostic Algorithm for Reducing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Misclassification
December 16, 2025
Arterial-Washout Temporal Profiling in CEUS LI-RADS: A Diagnostic Algorithm for Reducing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Misclassification
December 16, 2025

Role of elastography and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreas transplantation rejection

Background Rejection is the leading cause of graft failure, and its diagnosis remains a challenge. Elastography and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) are novel non-invasive techniques for quantifying tissue elasticity and perfusion.
Authors
Bassaganyas C, Ventura-Aguiar P, Sapena V, Soler-Perromat JC, Darnell A, Soler-Perromat A, Cuatrecasas M, Ferrer-Fàbrega J, Ayuso C, Garcia-Criado Á.
Journal
Eur Radiol. 2025 Dec;35(12):7915-7926. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11772-1.
Objectives To determine the  role of elastography and DCE-US  in pancreas graft rejection.
Methods
All pancreas transplantations performed in one  institution were prospectively studied with elastography and DCE-US at 1 week, 3 weeks, and 12 months post-transplantation. Surveillance biopsies were performed at 3 weeks and 12 months. Elastography and DCE-US were also conducted in all requested biopsies during this period (regardless of the date of transplantation). Patients were categorized according to the biopsy result: normal/rejection. Grafts with other complications were excluded. Cut-off values were established.
Results
One hundred twenty-one elastography and 127 DCE-US in 56 patients were included. All parameters showed a high dispersion during the first 90 days post-transplantation. After this period, the rejection group presented higher stiffness (0.97 vs 1.46 m/s, p < 0.001) and lower perfusion. The optimal cut-off value for elastography was 1.27 m/s (AUC 0.80), and for DCE-US were: peak enhancement 601 a.u. (AUC 0.67), wash-in AUC 2748 a.u. (AUC 0.70), wash-in rate 118 a.u. (AUC 0.65), wash-in perfusion index 369 a.u. (AUC 0.67), wash-out AUC 5181 a.u. (AUC 0.69) and total AUC 6388 a.u. (AUC 0.68). A combined predictive score showed that alteration of elastography and DCE-US was associated with a 23.2-fold probability of rejection.
Conclusions
After the first 90 days post-transplantation, pancreas graft rejection is associated with higher stiffness and lower graft perfusion.
Key points Pancreas graft rejection remains a clinical challenge, as there are currently no reliable non-invasive tests for its diagnosis.

After the first 90 days post-transplantation, elastography and DCE-US show higher stiffness and lower pancreas graft perfusion in the presence of rejection.

These non-invasive tools, which can be easily integrated into daily routine practice, may be useful in identifying grafts at higher risk of rejection, allowing closer follow-up or early biopsy to establish early rejection treatment, improving graft and patient survival.

Link (DOI) https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11772-1
Ultrasound speciality Contrast sonography, elastography

 

Short-Review by:

Prof. Dr. Zeno Sparchez
Department of Ultrasound
Institute for Gastroenterology and Hepatology
University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Cluj Napoca, Romania

Strengths:

a) Utilization of non-invasive, radiation-free, and repeatable ultrasound-based methods.
b) A powerful, multi-parametric approach combining two different functional imaging techniques (elastography and DCE-US).
c) The creation of a strong combined predictive score (23.2-fold probability of rejection) for identifying at-risk grafts.
d) addressing an urgent clinical need for better tools to guide biopsies and improve graft survival rates.

Weaknesses:

The small, single-center sample size limits the generalizability of the findings. The techniques were unreliable during the critical early period (first 90 days) after transplantation. Results are highly dependent on the skill of the ultrasound operator (operator-dependent variability). The findings are complementary and cannot replace the gold-standard diagnostic biopsy for confirmation.

Personally thinking:

The study’s main strength lies in exploring the combined use of two distinct functional imaging techniques elastography (assessing tissue stiffness) and DCS-US (assessing microvascular perfusion). The strong predictive value of the combined score  after the initial 90-day post-transplant period may help in selecting patients who truly need an invasive biopsy for confirmation, potentially reducing the number of unnecessary invasive procedures.